BACK TO THE FEATURE INDEX
Igraduated from the University of Virginia with a
doctorate in biophysics but with little intention of seeking a
postdoctoral position and with a modest concept of what other
career options were available to me. I had been educated and
trained to do one thing: research. Although I had a vague idea of
areas that interested me, science policy included, I was not
willing to pursue another degree. I needed to figure out what to do
with the one I had!
"I wanted to learn more about establishing priorities for
science initiatives in regions that traditionally do not receive
significant science funding."
As a result of a discussion with a Howard Hughes Medical
Institute (HHMI) investigator, I applied for, and eventually
accepted, a job running the Research Training Fellowships for
Medical Students program at HHMI. This fellowship program allows
medical students to take a year off from school to do research. As
I became acclimated to my new environment, I came to appreciate the
value of my work and regarded it as a contribution to science. I
realized that I shared the interest and enthusiasm of the
fellowship applicants and their mentors for the proposed research
projects and their desire to do good science. It also helped that
we had an enthusiastic review panel; its members valued their own
contributions to the program. I was satisfied with what I was doing
but began to think about my long-term goals. I read widely and saw
more of the complexity of science policy. I decided that I wanted
to understand, firsthand, how science-funding priorities are
established on a national level. The AAAS/National Science
Foundation (NSF) fellowship program has placed me where I want to
be--at the junction of science and policy.
In my discussions with past AAAS fellows, I learned that the
fellowship year would provide an opportunity for a unique
experience that would enable me to learn directly from
knowledgeable co-workers. I would be responsible for shaping my own
comprehension of public policy, for which gaining insight into
NSF's decision-making processes on the programmatic and
institutional level has been critical. I have a lot to learn, but I
am beginning to understand how science and engineering policy
informs critical societal concerns such as national security,
health care, and the environment.
I work in the Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (
OLPA ), part of
the NSF director's office. My fellowship term consists of three
4-month rotations with the Issues Development, Media Relations and
Public Information, and Congressional Affairs sections of OLPA.
Before the year is complete, my duties will include writing
speeches, congressional testimony, and press releases and making
visits to several universities.
The adventure of my position lies in the fact that I don't
always know what will happen next. As a staff member in this
office, I must acquire knowledge of the foundation's history,
programs, and initiatives as well as keep abreast of contemporary
issues, current funded research activity, and proceedings on
Capitol Hill. I have learned about climate and epidemiology,
biocomplexity, marine biotechnology, infrastructure development,
education ... and I expect this list to grow.
I arrived at NSF with some interests of my own. Specifically, I
wanted to learn more about establishing priorities for science
initiatives in regions that traditionally do not receive
significant science funding. I have pursued this interest with the
guidance of staff from the program office for the Experimental Program to Stimulate
Competitive Research (EPSCoR), which was authorized in 1978 to
aid the development of states' science and technology resources.
This program allows each eligible state the flexibility to
capitalize on its individual strengths, resources, and
circumstances to build its scientific capacity. The aim is to help
those states become more successful in competing for funding from
NSF and other federal agencies.
Although a primary focus of EPSCoR is to enable strong research
and education programs and expand the states' technological
capacity, the economic impacts are also of interest. As my career
progresses after my term at NSF, I am anxious to learn more about
how science and technology help feed lasting economic prosperity. I
want to develop and implement policies that facilitate the
contribution of science and engineering to social and economic
progress. Given the global nature of science and economics, I
expect my focus will easily expand to include multiple national and
international issues.
During my fellowship year, I am developing new skills that I can
use wherever I go. I have a new appreciation of the peer-review
process and of NSF's relationships with other executive-branch
agencies and Congress. Furthermore, I have gained experience in
preparing effective oral and written presentations that are
essential to convey policy positions and concerns. Finally, I have
seen the necessity and difficulty of explaining the content and
value of science to the public. Before I began this year, I could
only imagine what I would get out of this fellowship experience,
but I have not been disappointed. And although I have chosen to
become a policy wonk when I grow up, I believe that anyone can find
value in the fellowship experience--and you can enjoy yourself as
you do it!